The U.S. military is reportedly considering a surprising purchase—Tesla’s futuristic Cybertruck—but not for any of the uses Elon Musk envisioned. Instead of ferrying soldiers across rugged terrain or serving as a tactical EV, the trucks could end up on test ranges, destroyed by missiles as part of weapons testing programs.
Why the Cybertruck?
Defense analysts suggest that the Pentagon’s interest in the Cybertruck has little to do with its performance specs and everything to do with its design. The vehicle’s stainless-steel exoskeleton, unique angular profile, and high-tech materials make it an ideal candidate for simulating potential next-generation armored vehicles or unconventional battlefield targets.
According to military procurement insiders, one of the key drivers is the truck’s durability. In testing environments, defense contractors look for targets that can withstand multiple rounds of testing before total destruction. The Cybertruck’s rigid frame could allow engineers to analyze missile impact in greater detail, helping to fine-tune explosive payloads and targeting systems.
Symbolic Testing
Beyond practical considerations, there’s also an element of symbolic warfare. Military experts note that in conflict scenarios, adversaries often deploy unconventional vehicles for logistics and combat support. Using a highly recognizable consumer vehicle like the Cybertruck in missile tests could send a psychological message: that even cutting-edge civilian technology isn’t invulnerable.
Moreover, the Cybertruck’s rising popularity and cult status make it a compelling choice for simulated “high-value” targets. In the words of one defense analyst, “If you can blow up a Cybertruck, you can blow up anything.”
Potential Procurement Hurdles
Despite the Pentagon’s interest, there are logistical and financial challenges. The Cybertruck’s long waitlists and high demand could make it difficult to source enough units for testing. With prices ranging from around $60,000 to over $100,000 depending on configuration, critics question whether it’s fiscally wise to blow up luxury EVs when cheaper test platforms exist.
However, defense officials argue that cost is relative. The value of accurate weapons testing can far outweigh the price tag of a few high-end trucks—especially if it leads to more effective missile systems.
Tesla’s Role
It’s unclear how Tesla would respond to a large military order for vehicles destined for destruction. Elon Musk has had a complicated relationship with U.S. defense projects—SpaceX has been a major contractor for the Pentagon, but Musk has also expressed skepticism about some military engagements.
Some speculate that Tesla could refuse to sell directly to the military for this purpose, forcing the Pentagon to source Cybertrucks through third-party resellers or auctions. Others believe Musk might see the publicity value in having his creation withstand (or not withstand) a missile strike on camera.
Broader Implications
If the U.S. military goes through with the purchase, it could signal a shift in how defense planners approach target simulation. Rather than relying solely on purpose-built mock-ups, they may increasingly turn to real-world, commercially available vehicles that better mimic potential battlefield conditions.
In an era when electric and autonomous vehicles are becoming more common globally, the military’s testing programs may need to adapt—and the Cybertruck could be just the beginning.
